UMass law professor sues to end Massachusetts law giving unions ‘exclusive representation’ - Liberty Justice Center

UMass law professor sues to end Massachusetts law giving unions ‘exclusive representation’

To schedule an interview, contact Kristen Williamson at [email protected] or 773-809-4403.

BOSTON (Oct. 5, 2021) — University of Massachusetts School of Law professor Richard Peltz-Steele filed a federal lawsuit against UMass Faculty Federation, the university president and state officials to defend his right to free speech and freedom of association.

Peltz-Steele is a Chancellor Professor at the University of Massachusetts School of Law at Dartmouth, where he teaches torts and media-related topics. While he is a member of the bargaining unit represented by the UMass Faculty Federation, he is not a member of the union. Peltz-Steele is fighting Massachusetts’ illegal mandate that the faculty union can exclusively represent him in all salary negotiations, grievance procedures and other matters. He is represented by attorneys at the Liberty Justice Center, a nonprofit law firm known for its landmark Supreme Court victory for free speech in Janus v. AFSCME.

“The Supreme Court has made it clear that a law commanding involuntary affirmation of objected-to beliefs is unconstitutional,” said Jeffrey Schwab, managing attorney at the Liberty Justice Center. “Massachusetts’ insistence that UMass Faculty Federation, an organization Professor Peltz-Steele is not a member of, speak on his behalf without his permission is a clear infringement of his rights.”

Financial losses to the university during the COVID-19 crisis led to an employee-wide salary cut in 2020. The cut initially proposed by the university was 5% across the board. However, the union demanded a “progressive” structure that created different pay cuts depending on salary level. Ultimately, the established formula shaved 12% off Peltz-Steele’s pay for the year.

In October 2020, Peltz-Steele contacted the Dean of the Law School to inquire about filing a grievance, only to be told that the union’s Collective Bargaining Agreement essentially barred him from doing so without the union’s approval.

“Massachusetts and UMass Dartmouth have stripped me of my right to represent myself and my interests and handed it over to a private organization,” said Peltz-Steele. “I am not a member of the union and I do not give them permission to represent me and rashly agree to unreasonable terms that affect my livelihood. The Commonwealth cannot suspend my free speech rights to streamline negotiations.”

Peltz-Steele v. UMass Faculty Federation was filed Sept. 28, 2021, in U.S. District Court of the District of Massachusetts. Case filings are available here.

Complaint, Sept. 28, 2021
Press Release, Oct. 5, 2021

Media Contact Form

You might Also like

State of the Unions – Chicago Magazine

This article by Edward Robert McClelland was published October 24, 2022 on chicagomag.com. As other Midwestern states restrict labor’s power, an amendment on the Illinois ballot would further protect it here. Bruce Rauner hated unions. But as a Republican governor with a Democratic legislature, he...