Wenzig v. SEIU Local 668 - Liberty Justice Center

Wenzig v. SEIU Local 668

For decades, Pennsylvania required state employees who were not union members to pay hundreds of dollars a year in “agency fees” to government unions. However, in 2018 the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus v. AFSCME ended the practice of requiring government employees to fund government unions as a condition of working in public service.

On August 7, 2019, a new class action lawsuit, Wenzig v. SEIU Local 668, was filed against Pennsylvania union SEIU Local 668 demanding illegal non-member union fees be refunded to social services employees for the Commonwealth. If successful, approximately 2,000 employees could recoup as much as $1 million in illegal union fees they paid between 2017 and 2018.

The lead plaintiff in this case is Janine Wenzig, who has worked in the Department of Human Services, Office of Longterm Living since 2008. During her time working for the state, she paid $440 per year in agency fees to SEIU Local 668, despite never being a member of the union.

Wenzig and co-plaintiff Catherine Kioussis are seeking a refund of union fees she and other Pennsylvania employees paid from August 7, 2017, through June 27, 2018 – the time period permitted under the Pennsylvania statute of limitations. If they are successful, all Pennsylvania social services workers who were not union members but paid fees to SEIU Local 668 during that time period could receive refunds. While the employees could be entitled to about one year of union fees, most employees paid much more in illegal union fees over the course of their public service careers.


Wenzig v. SEIU Local 668 was filed on August 7, 2019, by attorneys at the Liberty Justice Center and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. The non-profit law firms also represented the plaintiff in the Janus case.


Complaint 08/07/2019

First Amended Complaint 10/28/2019

Joint Motion to Continue CMC 11/01/2019

Order Mooting MTD 11/04/2019

Order Denying Joint Motion to Continue CMC 11/05/2019

Opposition to MTD 11/19/2019

Final Order 12/10/2019

Memorandum 12/10/2019

Notice of Appeal 12/13/2019

Wenzig v. SEIU Third Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion 08/28/2020

Appellants Joint Petition for Rehearing En Banc 09/11/2020

Want to Learn More?

You might Also like

Virginia’s Discriminatory Ambassador Program – Courthouse News Service

This article by Joe Dodson was published December 8, 2022 on courthousenews.com. Virginia parents argue school ambassador program is discriminatory. Three Loudoun County parents say the school district’s student ambassador program, meant to combat systemic racism, discriminates against students based on their race and viewpoints....