Case

Levine v. Association of Legal Aid Attorneys

The Liberty Justice Center is representing two Jewish New York City public defenders who argue that they should not be forced to pay dues to a union which holds positions they believe to be antisemitic.

On April 11, the Liberty Justice Center filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Jewish New York City public defenders who argue that they should not be forced to pay dues to a union which holds positions they believe to be antisemitic.

To meet its legal obligation to provide free legal representation to individuals who have been accused of a crime and cannot otherwise afford a lawyer, the City of New York contracts with the not-for-profit Legal Aid Society. Legal Aid Society provides attorneys whose sole job is to serve as public defenders for the City of New York, whom it pays entirely from government funds it receives. Plaintiffs Arnold Levine and Allen Popper are two such public defenders.

Legal Aid Society has a collective bargaining agreement with the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys, which requires all employees to pay dues or their equivalent to the union to keep their jobs. Mr. Levine and Mr. Popper, who are Jewish, object to union positions and resolutions that they believe are antisemitic, and do not wish to be members or pay money to support the union.

Congress recently launched an investigation into the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys due to whistleblower reports of antisemitism by union members.

The Liberty Justice Center is suing the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys, Legal Aid Society, and the City of New York on behalf of Mr. Levine and Mr. Popper, alleging that these defendants are violating the attorneys’ First Amendment rights by forcing them to subsidize political speech as a condition of employment.

The Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from compelling a person to subsidize a union’s speech. In Janus v. AFSCME, the Court held that a government could not force its employees to pay a union as a condition of their employment. And in Harris v. Quinn, the Court held that a government could not compel recipients of government funds, through a state program to provide services to other private individuals, to pay money to a union.

“Under Janus, the government cannot compel public defenders to pay money to a union as a condition of their employment,” said Jeffrey Schwab, Senior Counsel at the Liberty Justice Center. “Nor can the City of New York force its public defenders to pay money to a union by hiring them through a nonprofit organization whose employees are unionized.”

“I shouldn’t have to financially support an organization that adopts antisemitic resolutions, sides with terrorist organizations, and advocates for the destruction of Israel in order to be a public defender in New York,” said plaintiff Arnold Levine.

Levine v. Association of Legal Aid Attorneys was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 11, 2024.

Attorneys

Jeffrey Schwab

Jeffrey M. Schwab

Jeffrey M. Schwab is a Senior Counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, where he litigates cases to protect the rights to free speech, economic liberty, private property and other Constitutional rights in both federal and state courts across the country.

Dean McGee

Dean McGee is Liberty Justice Center’s Educational Freedom Attorney, where he focuses on empowering parents and students to choose the educational path that best meets their needs.

James McQuaid

James McQuaid

James McQuaid is a staff attorney at Liberty Justice Center where he assists in cases to protect the rights to free speech, economic liberty, private property, and other Constitutional rights in courts across the country.

Case Press Releases

Case In The News

National Review
April 18, 2024

(National Review)—No one should be forced to pay money to an organization that advocates for points of view that they find deeply offensive. For example, a Jewish person shouldn’t be forced to pay for an organization that advocates ideas that he or she considers antisemitic. That’s the situation that Arnold...

Law360
April 11, 2024

(Law360)—A public defenders union violated the First Amendment by forcing two Jewish attorneys who oppose its pro-Palestine rhetoric to continue paying dues, the New York City-based attorneys claimed in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday, naming the city and their employer as defendants as well. Arnold Levine and Allen Popper said...

Reuters
April 11, 2024

(Reuters)—Two Jewish legal aid lawyers who represent indigent defendants in New York City filed a lawsuit on Thursday claiming that being forced to pay dues to their union after it accused Israel of “ethnic cleansing and genocide” in Gaza violates their constitutional rights. Their lawsuit in Manhattan federal court, against...

Bloomberg Law
April 11, 2024

(Bloomberg Law)—A pair of Jewish public defenders in New York City sued to stop paying money to their union because it made statements related to the Israeli-Hamas war that they consider antisemitic. The public defenders’ lawsuit filed Thursday argues for a novel extension of the US Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling...

Case Documents

April 11, 2024

ABOUT

NAME

Levine v. Association of Legal Aid Attorneys

FILED

April 11, 2024

COURT

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

STATUS

Pending

Media

To schedule an interview about this case, please contact us.