June Wheatley helps manage nine apartments in Virginia for her aging father’s trust. Like many small landlords, she does not have a legal department, a compliance staff, or the resources of a national property-management company. She is part of a small, family-run operation trying to manage property, serve tenants, and follow the law.
Then Virginia opened a fair-housing investigation.
The investigation began after Lucinda LC and Wheatley declined to participate in the voluntary federal Section 8 housing voucher program. They went to federal court, arguing that Virginia’s investigation violated federal law and the Fourth Amendment. But the district court refused to hear their claims, finding the case “unripe” because the state had not yet completed its enforcement process.
The Liberty Justice Center and Manhattan Institute filed an amicus brief urging the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse that decision. For a small business, a government investigation is not a minor inconvenience. It can mean legal bills, lost time, reputational harm, professional-license risk, and pressure to comply with a law the business believes is unlawful. The process itself can become the punishment.
The lower court’s ruling also risks trapping small businesses in a procedural no-man’s-land. If they challenge an investigation right away, they may be told they sued too soon. But if they wait for formal enforcement proceedings, federal courts may be required to abstain under Younger v. Harris. That means their federal constitutional claims could never receive meaningful review in federal court.
The Liberty Justice Center and Manhattan Institute filed their amicus brief to defend a simple principle: when government action is already causing real hardship, Americans should not be locked out of court.
Check back soon for more about this brief in the news.
To schedule an interview about this amicus brief, please contact us.