Religion or race shouldn’t impact eligibility for federal COVID relief funds nor should they limit students’ access to quality education, yet in South Carolina several groups are invoking a highly discriminatory law in order to deny non-public students and schools access to federal COVID relief funds.
South Carolina’s long-standing Blaine Amendment has a dark past. The provision was added to the state’s 1895 constitution in order to suppress the education of newly freed slaves and to enable discrimination against Catholic immigrants. Over the years it has been used to deny government funding to independent and religious schools, schools that serve a high percentage of Black and Catholic students.
Even now in 2021, the South Carolina Education Association and its allies are citing the Blaine Amendment as a reason to deny these students and schools access to federal COVID relief funds.
Bishop of Charleston v. Adams seeks to end more than a century of discrimination against African Americans and Catholics in South Carolina.
The Bishop of Charleston, a Corporation Sole, dba Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston which oversees 33 K-12 schools in South Carolina, and the South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities (SCICU), a nonprofit organization whose membership includes five Historically Black Colleges and Universities, have filed a lawsuit to prevent state officials from using the Blaine Amendment to block COVID funds from going to non-public schools.
“This lawsuit seeks educational equality for all,” said Dr. Jeff Perez, president and CEO of SCICU. “Our students are committed to completing their degrees in a significantly challenging time. We should be doing all we can to support them, not relying on outdated, divisive language evoking a dark period in our history to deny those seeking educational opportunity.”
Attorneys from the Liberty Justice Center are representing the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston and the SCICU. “This lawsuit seeks to achieve something that every American can stand behind: We’re fighting to strike down a century-old law that was enacted with the purpose of discriminating against our fellow citizens,” said Daniel Suhr, senior attorney for the Liberty Justice Center. “It is time for us to stand up and eradicate this bigotry so it cannot be used to deny educational resources to South Carolina students.”
Jacob Huebert serves as the president of the Liberty Justice Center. He previously served as the Liberty Justice Center’s Director of Litigation. In that role, he successfully litigated cases to protect economic liberty, free speech and other constitutional rights. Jacob and his work have appeared in numerous national media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, New York Times and Fox News Channel.
(The Daily Wire)—If you didn’t know better, you might think that racism and anti-Catholicism are alive and well among several groups purportedly dedicated to rooting out just that sort of prejudice. In an eyebrow-raising move, lawyers at Georgetown University, a Catholic institution, teamed up with the NAACP, the civil rights...
(Wall Street Journal)—A federal lawsuit in South Carolina is taking direct aim at one of the state’s uglier legacies: the Blaine Amendment embedded in its state constitution. Blaine Amendments are a relic of 19th-century prejudice, and meant to deny public funding for religious (read: Catholic) schools. More recently the state...
(The Hill)—A recently filed lawsuit could make South Carolina the second state in the nation to be forced to stop using vestiges of 19th century bigotry, in the form of the Blaine Amendments, to block 21st century education reform. When Congress passed the CARES Act last March, it included emergency...
(The Post and Courier)—Private schools suing the state for access to millions of dollars in public funds urged a federal judge to help South Carolina move beyond the “mistakes of its past” by forcing the distribution of the money to dozens of independent schools. U.S. District Judge Bruce Hendricks heard...
(Greenville News)—Attorneys representing two private schools groups have asked a federal judge to temporarily prevent South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster from spending his discretionary coronavirus aid money while a lawsuit attempts to repeal a section of the state’s Constitution. The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Charleston on...
(US News & World Report)—Private schools and colleges asked a federal judge Monday to strike down the provision in South Carolina‘s constitution that bars public money for private and religious schools, saying the 1895 measure is discriminatory. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston and South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities...
(Liberty Justice Center)—“Blaine Amendments” remain in state constitutions, even after SCOTUS ruled against them In South Carolina and across the nation, provisions called “Blaine Amendments” were put in place to discriminate against a wave of Catholic immigrants in the mid-1800s and against Protestant missionaries who traveled to the South to...
(The Post and Courier Greenville)—A group of Christian schools in South Carolina submitted a friend of the court brief in support of a recent federal lawsuit that calls for a revision of the state’s constitutional ban on public funds for private schools. The S.C. Association of Christian Schools on April...
(ABC 4 News)—On Monday, the South Carolina Association of Christian Schools filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in Bishop of Charleston v. Adams. SCACS represents 69 member schools which serve over 9,000 students across South Carolina. In its brief, SCACS underlined the present-day impact of this long-standing...
(Inside Higher Ed)—A lawsuit filed in federal district court argues that a provision of the South Carolina state constitution that bars public funds from being used for the “direct benefit” of religious or other private educational institutions should be struck down because it was born out of racist and anti-Catholic...