Vugo v. City of Chicago
Chicago's ban on advertisements in and on ridesharing vehicles – but not in or on taxis and other vehicles – violates drivers' and advertisers' constitutional rights to free speech and equal protection.
Illinois general assembly won’t override veto of ridesharing bill
State legislators aren’t done trying to meddle in this market
Misguided Uber restrictions are back from the dead
Do the taxi lobby’s arguments hold up? Not when you look at the record of taxi companies.
Gov. Quinn vetoes Uber bill
The veto is good news for ridesharing consumers and drivers
To catch up with Uber, Chicago taxi group proposes … higher fares?
Hiking prices doesn’t seem like a good way to save an industry that is already losing out to lower-priced competitors
Rideshare drivers rally to defend their jobs
The latest version of the bill would still harm the drivers who make a living by providing ridesharing services
Update: The taxi cartel’s attacks on ridesharing in Chicago
When the taxi lobby turned to the Illinois General Assembly for help, they proposed a ridesharing bill full of provisions that would harm consumers and ridesharing drivers for no reason