Liberty Justice Center v. Grewal

Liberty Justice Center v. Grewal

Liberty Justice Center sues New Jersey Attorney General to bring donor disclosure laws in line with the Supreme Court ruling

On July 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the importance of donor privacy in protecting free speech in Americans for Prosperity v. Bonta. In that decision overturning California’s overreaching donor disclosure requirements, the justices delivered a win for the First Amendment, ensuring supporters of popular and unpopular causes alike are safe from the whims of cancel culture.

In a federal lawsuit, the Liberty Justice Center is demanding New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal immediately abandon the state’s disclosure requirements and align their requirements with the decision in Bonta, which shut down a nearly identical overbroad policy in California. The Liberty Justice Center is a registered charity in New Jersey and is represented by private attorneys in this lawsuit.

Laws like New Jersey’s discourage the exercise of free speech by violating the privacy of charitable donors and organizations. Instead of a tax return, nonprofits file a Form 990 with the IRS which catalogs their expenses and revenues. New Jersey requires nonprofits to share their Form 990 with the states’ charities offices. This includes the confidential Schedule B, which lists contributors and their contribution amounts. A state’s failure to safeguard this information can lead to harassment and retaliation against everyday Americans who support different charitable causes.

Privacy is integral to a country that respects our freedom to speak and associate freely, whether the topic at hand is controversial or not. By ignoring the U.S. Supreme Court and forcing charitable organizations to turn over the donors’ private information, New Jersey is violating Americans’ right to free speech.

The Liberty Justice Center has filed a similar lawsuit in New York, Liberty Justice Center v. James.

Background

Liberty Justice Center v. Grewal was filed in the United States District Court for New Jersey on July 13, 2021. This case was resolved on May 12, 2022 when the State amended its regulations to come into compliance with the AFP decision.

Briefs

Complaint 07/14/2021

Notice of Dismissal 05/12/2022

Want to Learn More?

You might Also like

Former ASU Student Appeals Conviction for Distributing Constitution- Newsmax

This article by Nicole Wells was published January 27, 2023 on newsmax.com.  Former Arizona State Student Appeals Conviction for Distributing Constitution Copies Liberty Justice Center filed an appeal on behalf of a former Arizona State University student who was convicted of trespassing when he handed...

Virginia’s Discriminatory Ambassador Program – Courthouse News Service

This article by Joe Dodson was published December 8, 2022 on courthousenews.com. Virginia parents argue school ambassador program is discriminatory. Three Loudoun County parents say the school district’s student ambassador program, meant to combat systemic racism, discriminates against students based on their race and viewpoints....