our Case

BASED Politics, Inc. v. Garland

The Liberty Justice Center filed a lawsuit to challenge the recently enacted federal TikTok ban for violating its users’ First Amendment right to free speech.

About BASED Politics, Inc. v. Garland

On June 6, the Liberty Justice Center filed a lawsuit to challenge the recently enacted federal TikTok ban for violating its users’ First Amendment right to free speech. The Liberty Justice Center is representing BASED Politics Inc., a nonprofit that publishes educational content on free markets and individual liberty on a variety of platforms, including TikTok, where its accounts have tens of thousands of followers and its videos have millions of views.

In April 2024, President Biden signed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a statute that will effectively ban TikTok in the United States by making it illegal for U.S. users to “access, maintain, or update” any apps owned by “foreign adversaries”—defined to specifically include TikTok. The statute gives TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance Ltd., 270 days—until January 19, 2025—to sell the app to a new owner that the President does not deem a foreign adversary. Otherwise, the federal government will force U.S. hosting services and app stores to shut down all access to the app.

The Liberty Justice Center’s lawsuit argues that the Act violates the First Amendment because it bans all speech on TikTok—even though all, or nearly all, of that speech is constitutionally protected. The lawsuit also argues that lawmakers’ justifications for the ban—national security and protecting Americans from propaganda—cannot justify the infringement on users’ First Amendment rights, because there is no evidence that TikTok threatens national security or that a complete ban is necessary to address whatever threat it might pose. Furthermore, the lawsuit argues, the First Amendment does not allow the government to suppress “propaganda,” which is simply speech.

The Liberty Justice Center’s lawsuit asks the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to declare the Act unconstitutional and issue an order preventing the U.S. Attorney General from enforcing it.

“The federal government’s ban on TikTok is a ban on speech,” said Jacob Huebert, President of the Liberty Justice Center. “The ban would eliminate a forum where millions of Americans express and hear important ideas. It violates the First Amendment, and the court should strike it down.”

“There’s a popular—and wrong—stereotype that TikTok is just a platform for trending dances. The fact is that millions of Americans use TikTok to exercise their right to free speech, seriously discussing important political and social issues. The First Amendment protects that right, but the proposed TikTok ban would trample all over it in a misguided effort to protect Americans through sweeping acts of censorship,” said plaintiff Hannah Cox, co-founder of BASED Politics.

“It’s not just funny cat videos—millions of Gen Z Americans like me use TikTok to express ourselves, share news, and debate our ideas. Many of us have also invested years of work into building businesses and careers online, and now face the prospect of watching our livelihoods be destroyed overnight,” said plaintiff Brad Polumbo, co-founder of BASED Politics. “The government’s de facto TikTok ban tramples on our First Amendment rights and represents one of the most egregious acts of censorship in modern American history. We are proud to partner with the Liberty Justice Center to stop this unconstitutional act of censorship and the economic carnage it would inflict on hundreds of thousands of Americans.”

BASED Politics Inc. v. Garland was filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on June 6, 2024.

Support Free Speech Today!

Make a contribution today and stop these attacks on all American’s First Amendment rights.

media requests

To schedule an interview about this case, please contact us.

Case Details

CASE NAME

BASED Politics, Inc. v. Garland

Filed

June 6, 2024

Court

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Status

Closed

Liberty Justice Center Attorneys

Jacob Huebert

Jacob Huebert

Jacob Huebert serves as the president of the Liberty Justice Center. He previously served as the Liberty Justice Center’s Director of Litigation. In that role, he successfully litigated cases to protect economic liberty, free speech and other constitutional rights. Jacob and his work have appeared in numerous national media outlets, including the Wall Street JournalNew York Times and Fox News Channel.

Jeffrey Schwab

Jeffrey M. Schwab

Jeffrey M. Schwab is a Senior Counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, where he litigates cases to protect the rights to free speech, economic liberty, private property and other Constitutional rights in both federal and state courts across the country.

James McQuaid

James McQuaid

James McQuaid is a staff attorney at Liberty Justice Center where he assists in cases to protect the rights to free speech, economic liberty, private property, and other Constitutional rights in courts across the country.

BASED Politics, Inc. v. Garland Details

The Washington Times | Court Watch Podcast

Interview: Lawyer for TikTok User Reacts to Supreme Court Weighing TikTok Ban

January 13, 2025

(The Washington Times | Court Watch Podcast)—Jacob Huebert, President of the Liberty Justice Center and lead counsel for one of the parties in the Supreme Court’s TikTok case, breaks down Friday’s hearing in this episode of the Washington Times’ Court Watch Podcast. Read more about the Liberty Justice Center’s lawsuit...

BBC News

Interview: SCOTUS Hears Arguments Against TikTok Ban—Lawyer Talks First Amendment Fight with BBC News

January 12, 2025

(BBC News)—In this interview with BBC News, Liberty Justice Center President Jacob Huebert discusses LJC’s First Amendment lawsuit against the proposed federal TikTok ban, which the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on last Friday. The Court is expected to issue a decision on whether or not to halt the...

Tampa Free Press

Opinion: Trump Has Changed His Tune On TikTok. The Supreme Court Should Listen

January 10, 2025

(Tampa Free Press)—In his first term, President Trump tried to ban TikTok. Now he’s changed his tune: he’s asking the Supreme Court to delay enforcement of the federal ban that’s set to take effect on January 19. The reason: so that, after he takes office on January 20, he can...

The Hill

TikTok’s Future Hangs in Balance at Friday’s Supreme Court Arguments

January 10, 2025

(The Hill)—TikTok’s future will hang in the balance Friday when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments over a federal law that could ban the video-sharing platform nationwide in less than 10 days. In its waning days, the Biden-era Justice Department will square off in the courtroom against lawyers for TikTok...

The Tennessee Star

Attorney Jacob Huebert Details TikTok Case Being Argued in the Supreme Court This Week

January 9, 2025

(The Tennessee Star)—Jacob Huebert, president of the Liberty Justice Center, detailed this week’s upcoming oral arguments in the case TikTok, Inc. v. Garland before the U.S. Supreme Court, explaining how the plaintiffs in the case are seeking to prevent the current law requiring TikTok to divest from its parent company...

The Michael Patrick Leahy Show

Interview: Fighting for Free Speech—Jacob Huebert Talks Supreme Court Lawsuit Against TikTok Ban

January 8, 2025

(The Michael Patrick Leahy Show)—Liberty Justice Center President Jacob Huebert joins Michael Patrick Leahy to discuss LJC’s Supreme Court fight for the First Amendment. Learn more about the threat the proposed federal TikTok ban poses to Americans’ free speech rights here.

...
The Washington Times

Opinion: Supreme Court Can Strike Down Biden Censorship Regime’s Last Gasp in TikTok Case

January 8, 2025

(The Washington Times)—If there’s one policy priority that the Biden administration will be remembered for — and that we should be glad to be putting behind us — it’s the censorship of dissenting speech online. Within days of President Biden’s inauguration in 2021, the White House began privately pressuring social...

The Tennessean

With the Clock Running on TikTok, Nashville Content Creators Worry about the Future

January 8, 2025
(The Tennessean)—Despite facing a First Amendment lawsuit in June, filed by the nonprofit legal group Liberty Justice Center, the law was upheld in a Washington D.C. federal court in December. But on Dec. 16, the Liberty Justice Center joined a group of TikTok creators in filing an emergency petition to...
Tampa Free Press

Liberty Justice Center Urges Supreme Court to Strike down Federal TikTok Ban ahead of Oral Arguments

January 3, 2025

(Tampa Free Press)—The Liberty Justice Center (LJC) filed its final reply brief on January 3, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reject a proposed federal TikTok ban on the grounds that it violates the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans. With oral arguments scheduled for January 10 and a...

The Mark Davis Show

US Supreme Court Will Hear Liberty Justice Center Challenge to TikTok Ban

December 30, 2024

(The Mark Davis Show)—On January 10, the US Supreme Court will hear the Liberty Justice Center’s First Amendment lawsuit challenging the proposed federal TikTok ban. In this interview on the Mark Davis Show, Liberty Justice Center President Jacob Huebert joins Tom Giovanetti to discuss LJC’s lawsuit, the implications of the...

June 6, 2024
June 28, 2024
January 17, 2025