Case Background: On February 11, the Liberty Justice Center and California Justice Center filed a federal lawsuit challenging a California law that violates employers’ First Amendment rights by prohibiting companies from discussing any “religious or political matters” at mandatory meetings.
On September 27, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 399 (SB 399) into law. Although labeled the “California Worker Freedom from Employer Intimidation Act,” SB 399 does not actually address intimidation—rather, it bans California employers from communicating with their employees about political or religious matters during any mandatory meetings, such as all-staff calls.
SB 399 restricts speech based on its content, declaring that Californian employers may discuss almost any topic in mandatory employee meetings—except politics and religion. The Supreme Court has ruled that such content-based restrictions on free speech presumptively violate the First Amendment.
On February 11, the Liberty Justice Center partnered with the California Justice Center to challenge SB 399 on behalf of the California Policy Center (CPC), a nonprofit that conducts research on public policy matters across the state, including education reform and government transparency. Because the organization’s central work entails researching state politics and communicating its findings to Californian residents, CPC regularly holds all-staff meetings to discuss political matters. However, SB 399 now makes such meetings illegal.
This restriction on the CPC’s ability to hold mandatory employee meetings about political matters important to its mission and daily work violates the organization’s right to free speech under the First Amendment. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin SB 399 to restore employers’ free speech rights across the state of California.
“The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly found that content-based restrictions on free speech are presumptively unconstitutional. California cannot pick and choose what employers may say at mandatory employee meetings. We urge the court to strike down this overt violation of the First Amendment,” said Jeffrey Schwab, Senior Counsel at the Liberty Justice Center.
“SB 399 sets a dangerous precedent by allowing the government to punish Californian employers for their speech based on whether it approves of the content of that speech. We are proud to join the Liberty Justice Center in challenging this legislation,” said Will Swaim, President of the California Policy Center, plaintiff in the lawsuit.
California Policy Center v. Garcia-Brower was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on February 11, 2025.
Liberty Justice Center is appealing to the Ninth Circuit after the district court dismissed the case on June 24, 2025, seeking to overturn the dismissal and enjoin California’s SB 399 as a content-based restriction on employer speech that violates the First Amendment.
Jeffrey M. Schwab serves as Senior Counsel and Interim Director of Litigation at the Liberty Justice Center, where he litigates cases to protect the rights to free speech, economic liberty, private property and other Constitutional rights in both federal and state courts across the country.
Noelle Daniel is a staff attorney at Liberty Justice Center where she assists in cases to protect the rights to free speech, economic liberty, private property, and other Constitutional rights in courts across the country.
Tim Kilcullen serves as a staff attorney at the Liberty Justice Center. He has a deep passion for protecting Americans’ fundamental liberties, particularly their right to free speech and a free press.
(Venable LLP)—Mandatory employer-sponsored meetings, otherwise known as captive audience meetings, sparked significant discussion and legislation these past few months. There are now 12 states that have enacted laws designed to ban or restrict captive audience meetings: Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and,...
(Labor & Employment Law Blog)—As discussed in our recent article, the introduction of SB 399 in California (approved and added as California Labor Code section 1137) sparked significant discussion and concern among California employers with union employees. The legislation, which became effective January 1, 2025, restricts so-called “captive audience meetings”...
(Northern California Record)—Saying the law unconstitutionally tramples the free speech rights of business owners and others, California business advocates, trade groups and others have taken to the courts to challenge a new California state law, which bans employers from discussing “religious or political matters” with their workers. The California Chamber...
(The Orange County Register)—George F. Will once said that football combines the two worst features of American life – violence and meetings. Americans are often divided on matters of violence, but we’re nearly united in our hatred of meetings. So you might have expected that my colleagues would have been...
(Tampa Free Press)—The Liberty Justice Center (LJC) and California Justice Center (CJC) have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a California law that restricts employers from discussing political or religious matters during mandatory employee meetings. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of the California Policy Center (CPC), argues that Senate Bill 399...
No results found right now, please visit our newsroom.