Stroeder v. SEIU Local 503 - Liberty Justice Center

Stroeder v. SEIU Local 503

Colleen Stroeder has worked for the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) as an executive support specialist since 2008. Upon starting her position, Stroeder’s supervisor led her to believe that she was required to join SEIU Local 503 and pay union dues.

After the Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision in Janus v. AFSCME, Stroeder learned of her right to join or not to join a union, and her newly reaffirmed right not to pay the government union to keep her government job. At the time, Stroeder was paying nearly $800 per year in union dues.

She sent a letter to her union rep. on August 28, 2018, to resign her membership and cease dues deductions. However, the union refused her request, and pointed to an arbitrary opt-out window that had already passed just weeks before. On April 23, 2019, she again demanded that the union cease dues deductions, but heard no response back.

Attorneys at the Liberty Justice Center are now representing Stroeder in a lawsuit against SEIU Local 503, ODOT and the Governor of Oregon, Kate Brown. Stroeder is requesting not only a refund of her union dues, but is also challenging the Oregon state law that codifies the arbitrary resignation period which allowed SEIU to continue to violate her First Amendment rights and trap her in the union against her will.

Lead Attorney

Daniel Suhr

Managing Attorney

To schedule an interview, please contact [email protected]


The case, Stroeder v. SEIU Local 503, et al., was filed on July 30, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Portland Division.


Complaint 07/30/2019

Motion for Preliminary Injunction 08/02/2019

Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Injunction 08/02/2019

Exhibit One 08/02/2019

Notice of Withdrawal Preliminary Injunction 08/09/2019

Order Preliminary Injunction Moot 08/10/2019

Response to MTD 10/30/2019

Opinion and Order 12/06/2019

Notice of Appeal 12/17/2019

Proposed Order Stay of Case 12/17/2019

Order Granting Stay 12/19/2019

Proposed Order to Continue Stay of Case 03/18/2020

Order Granting Continue Stay of Case 03/20/2020

Want to Learn More?

You might Also like

Virginia’s Discriminatory Ambassador Program – Courthouse News Service

This article by Joe Dodson was published December 8, 2022 on Virginia parents argue school ambassador program is discriminatory. Three Loudoun County parents say the school district’s student ambassador program, meant to combat systemic racism, discriminates against students based on their race and viewpoints....